Streaming Music Rights are the invisible currency of the modern entertainment world, yet for decades, the inner workings of the Indian music industry—particularly the complex contractual relationship between artists, labels, and production houses—remained shrouded in mystery, accessible only to legal teams and senior executives. Today, however, these long-held secrets are being stripped bare, not by journalistic exposés, but by the very content they help create: the explosion of high-quality Indian web series. These streaming shows, defined by their narrative freedom and commitment to realism, are offering a stunning, often brutal glimpse into the cutthroat ecosystem of sound recording ownership, royalty fraud, and the stifling power dynamics that govern who gets paid and who is exploited.
The burgeoning Over-The-Top (OTT) landscape in India has necessitated the creation of deep, nuanced characters and narratives that reflect contemporary professional struggles. When these narratives turn toward creative industries, the music business—with its high stakes, dazzling facade, and inherent vulnerability of the creative talent—provides perfect dramatic fodder. Unlike traditional Bollywood cinema, which often romanticized the journey of the struggling singer, modern web series are focused on the business of art, exposing the systemic loopholes that keep wealth concentrated at the top.
—
The New Narrative Vehicle: Why Web Series Expose the System
For nearly a century, Hindi cinema operated under the patronage of major music labels (often referred to as “music companies”), which financed massive albums and controlled distribution. The relationship was proprietary and rarely questioned on screen. Films were large, polished spectacles where ethical concerns took a back seat to glamour.
The arrival of the web series format—characterized by multi-season arcs, extended runtime, and a noticeable absence of Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) constraints—provided the perfect incubation ground for complex, real-world issues. Directors found they could spend entire episodes dissecting a single legal document, or illustrating the crippling mental toll of an unfair contract.
Web series demand authenticity. Scripts diving into the lives of struggling DJs, aspiring composers, or independent lyricists quickly found that the most compelling drama wasn’t the creation of the music itself, but the battle for ownership after the creation. These shows leverage the gritty realism afforded by streaming platforms to reveal the dark trinity of industry abuse: the buyout contract culture, the prevalence of ghost producing, and the systematic denial of performance royalties.
Buyouts and the Death of Eternal Royalties
One of the most frequently exposed secrets in current Indian web series is the practice of ‘lifetime buyouts.’ This is a contractual mechanism where a record label or production house pays a composer, lyricist, or singer a single, fixed lump sum (often modest) to acquire all future rights to their work, across all platforms and formats, forever.
Web series frequently dramatize the scenario where a desperate, young artist, needing immediate cash for rent or equipment, signs away a masterpiece. Years later, when that song becomes a viral sensation on streaming services accessed by billions across the globe, the artist receives nothing beyond that initial payment. The series narrative often uses the ensuing financial and emotional devastation of the artist—contrasted with the lavish lifestyle of the label owner—to highlight the deep moral injury caused by this commonplace industry practice.
—
Unmasking Industry Manipulation: Payola and Ghost Production
Beyond contractual exploitation, modern Indian scripted content dives deep into the operational compromises necessary for success, showcasing the mechanisms of manipulation that dictate popular charts.
The Problem of Payola and Playlist Curating
In the digital age, payola—the illegal practice of paying commercial radio stations to feature a song without disclosure—has evolved into ‘playlist plugging.’ Because streaming services dominate music discovery, getting placement on a service’s high-traffic editorial playlists can make or break a career.
Web series frequently depict managers or label executives engaging in shadowy deals, where vast sums of money or favors are exchanged to guarantee a young artist’s placement on a ‘Trending Now’ playlist, effectively manufacturing fame. The dramatic tension lies in the ethical cost: the truly talented, independent artist who refuses to participate is left invisible, while less talented, label-backed peers soar to fame. These storylines serve as a critical commentary on the illusion of meritocracy in the digital music sphere.
The Creative Theft of Ghost Producing
Another stunning secret being brought to light is the prevalence of ‘ghost producing and composing.’ This involves a renowned musician or music director hiring a lesser-known (and cheaper) talent to do the bulk of the creative work—the melody, arrangement, or beat—and then taking sole, or primary, credit for it.
Characters in these streamed dramas often grapple with the identity crisis of knowing their work is being hailed as genius under someone else’s name. The shows highlight the hierarchical power imbalance: the high-profile ghost producer is promised professional opportunities or future contracts, but given an immediate non-disclosure agreement (NDA) and a short-term payout, ensuring their contribution remains a secret, protecting the brand reputation of the established music director.
—
The Hidden Wars Over Streaming Music Rights
The intersection of streaming technology and Indian copyright law provides the most complex, and dramatically rewarding, secrets for screenwriters. The drama here is centered on the distinction between two fundamental types of intellectual property (IP) often conflated by the public: the underlying composition (lyrics and melody) and the master sound recording (the finished track).
In the Indian context, the primary battlefield for creators seeking their due is the Indian Performing Right Society (IPRS). IPRS is the legal body responsible for safeguarding the intellectual property of lyricists, composers, and publishers, and ensuring they receive royalties whenever their work is performed, broadcast, or streamed publicly.
Web series that focus on the granular details of the business often include narrative arcs where the struggling protagonist realizes they are losing millions not because the song isn’t popular, but because the label, which owns the master recording rights, has either failed to register the composition rights correctly with IPRS or, more nefariously, has registered only itself as the owner, excluding the primary creator from publishing income.
This exposure of the technicalities is crucial. The series educate viewers on how even a small misfiling or an intentionally vague clause in a contract defining “mechanical rights” versus “synchronization rights” can funnel millions away from the creator and directly into the coffers of the major labels that dominate the Indian music ecosystem. The series reveal the complex digital architecture—how global platforms like YouTube, Spotify, and Apple Music report royalty usage—and how label administration departments often deliberately complicate the paper trail, leveraging the creator’s ignorance about IPRS structures.
—
Dramatization as Advocacy: Real-World Impact
While web series focusing on these themes—whether it is a dark crime series using music industry rivalry as a backdrop, or a coming-of-age story about an indie band—are works of fiction, their collective impact has been substantial. By presenting these secret business practices dramatically, the public conversation around artist compensation has shifted from abstract discussion to concrete, relatable injustices.
Several fictionalized accounts have tackled the ethical gray areas of music synchronization rights—the right to use a piece of music in a visual medium like a film or commercial. Web series show how composers who manage to retain a fraction of their IP rights often face fierce resistance when licensing their work independently, showing the labels’ dominance over the entire licensing chain. The tension is palpable in scenes where an independent artist must choose between suing a massive corporation—a battle they cannot afford to win—or signing a settlement that silences them forever.
The cumulative effect of these revealing narratives has been a powerful, albeit subtle, form of advocacy. Artists and creators within the industry, no longer operating in informational silos, are now more aware of the traps awaiting them.
Demanding Transparency and Reform
These streamed narratives have essentially democratized the knowledge of music law. Young musicians entering the industry are now researching IPRS registration, questioning multi-page contracts, and demanding clear terms regarding the percentage distribution of streaming revenue.
The series reveal that the greatest secret of the Indian music industry is not an illegal activity, but the pervasive exploitation that is fundamentally legal due to outdated, label-friendly contract standards and the imbalance of negotiating power. By consistently shining a light on this imbalance, these web series are performing a necessary public service. They are forcing a conversation about ethical compensation and the need for updated copyright laws that favor the creators whose art drives the entire multi-billion-dollar streaming economy.
In conclusion, the Indian web series landscape has transformed from mere entertainment into a vital, engaging critique of the professional world. By making the boring, yet crucial, subject of intellectual property and royalty distribution exciting dramatic content, the secrets of the music business are secrets no more, paving the path for potential reform catalyzed by popular awareness.
